Information about financial planning, investments, and retirement plans

Target Date Funds: 6 Considerations Before Investing

Share

Target Date Funds are a staple of many 401(k) plans. Most Target Date Funds are funds of mutual funds. The three largest firms in the TDF space are Fidelity, T. Rowe Price, and Vanguard with a combined market share of about 80 percent. All three firms use only their own funds as the underlying investments in their target-date fund offerings. Some other firms offer other formats, such as funds of exchange-traded funds, but the fund of mutual funds is still the most common structure.

Here are 6 considerations to think about when deciding whether to use the Target Date Fund option in your company’s retirement savings plan:

Is the Glide Path really that important?

Much has been made of whether the Glide Path (a leveling of the fund’s equity allocation into retirement) should take investors to or through retirement. Target Date Fund providers spend a lot of time devising and administering the Glide Path that their funds use into and through your retirement years.   Before making too much of this, however, the key question is what will you do with your retirement plan dollars once you retire? TDF providers hope that you take the money invested in their Target Date Funds and roll these dollars into an IRA with them, maintaining your Target Date Fund position.  There are big dollars at stake for them.  In reality you might take your money out of the plan and do something else with it, including consolidating these funds with other retirement assets already in an IRA perhaps at another custodian.

How does the allocation of the Target Date Fund fit with your other investments? 

Many 401(k) participants invest their retirement dollars in a vacuum—meaning they don’t take their investments outside of the plan into consideration when making their investment choices. This is fine for younger workers just starting out.  Their 401(k) investment might be their only investment and the instant diversification of a Target Date Fund is fine here.

For those with other outside investments such as taxable accounts, a spouse’s retirement plan, and perhaps an IRA rolled over from old 401(k)s, this is a big mistake. Given that TDFs are funds of funds you might become over or under allocated in one or more areas and not know it as your account grows. Factoring the Target Date Fund allocation into your overall portfolio is critical. 

Is the Target Date Fund closest to your projected retirement date the right choice for you?

For example, a 2020 Target Date Fund is conceivably meant for someone who is 58 and retiring in seven years. If you were to take three 58-year-olds and look at their respective financial situations and tolerance for risk, it is likely that they are all fairly different. Plan providers need to do a better job of communicating to plan participants that the fund with the date closest to their projected retirement date may not be the right fund for their needs. Look at your own unique situation and pick the TDF that best fits your needs. 

Understand the underlying expenses

In some cases, the overall expense ratio may be a weighted average of the underlying funds. Others may also tack on a management fee to cover the costs of managing the fund. As with any investment, understand what you are being charged and what you are getting for your money. 

Target Date Funds don’t equate to low risk

Many participants are under the mistaken impression that investing in a Target Date Fund is a low risk proposition. As we saw in 2008, nothing could be further from the truth. Many investors in 2010 funds saw losses in excess of 20 percent. A recent review of more than 40 Target Date Fund families showed the share of stocks in the funds designed for those retiring in the current year ranged from about 25 percent to about 75 percent. As with any mutual fund, look under the hood and understand the level of risk that you will be assuming.

Investing in Target Date Funds doesn’t guarantee retirement success 

Contrary to the belief of some, investing in a Target Date Fund doesn’t guarantee that you will have enough saved at retirement.  Building a sufficient retirement nest egg is all about how much you save and how you invest those savings.  Target Date Funds may or may not be the best investment vehicle for your needs.

Target Date Funds can be a good vehicle for 401(k) participants and others who are not comfortable allocating their own investments. Unfortunately, TDFs are not a set it and forget it proposition. Investing in Target Date Funds requires periodic review to ensure that the fund you have chosen is still right for your situation. Retirement plan providers and sponsors also need to do a better job of communicating the benefits, pitfalls, and potential uses of these funds to plan participants.

Please feel free to contact me with questions about 401(k) investment options or about your overall financial and retirement planning needs.  Check out our Financial Planning and Investment Advice for Individuals page for more information about our services.  

For you do-it-yourselfers, check out Morningstar.com to analyze your Target Date Fund and all 401(k) investment options and to get a free trial for their premium services.  Please check out our Resources page for links to some additional tools and services that might be beneficial to you.  

Photo credit:  Flickr

Enhanced by Zemanta

T. Rowe Price Target Date Funds – A Look Under The Hood

Share

This is another in a series of posts on Target Date Funds that I’ve written for this blog.  As both a financial planner for individual clients and an advisor to several 401(k) plans I have mixed feelings about them.  TDFs offer investors a professionally managed all-in-one investment solution.  Ideally you invest in the fund with a target date closest to your anticipated retirement date and the fund does the rest.

Personally I like TDFs more for younger investors versus those who are within say 15 years or so of retirement.  Target Date Funds have become a staple in 401(k) plans due to the safe harbor given to plan sponsors who use them as the default investment choice for those plan participants who do not make an election of their own.

Fidelity, T. Rowe Price, and Vanguard control about 80% of the assets in Target Date Funds.

Recently mutual fund ranking service Morningstar revamped its ranking methodology for Target Date Fund families.  They moved to the Gold, Silver, and Bronze rankings they implemented for mutual funds in 2012.  For the period ending December 31, 2012, only T. Rowe Price and Vanguard received the top Gold ranking.  Fidelity was ranked as Neutral.

Let’s take a look under the hood at the T. Rowe Price Target Date Funds.  T. Rowe offers funds with target dates beginning in 2005 and going out to 2055 in five year increments.  Additionally they offer an Income version of the fund for those already in retirement.

Active Management

T. Rowe uses mutual funds from its line-up of funds that are available to the public.  The underlying funds are almost exclusively actively managed in contrast to Vanguard’s use of its passive index funds.  The overall expense ratio of the funds is a weighted rollup of the underlying funds and currently ranges from 0.57% for the Retirement Income fund to 0.78% for the most aggressive fund, the Target 2055.  This is more expensive than Vanguard but all of the T. Rowe funds rank in the top quartile (less expensive) of their respective Morningstar categories. 

Solid Underlying Funds

Each of the 12 T. Rowe Price Target Date Funds received a ranking in the top quartile (the top 25%) of their respective Target Date categories, with 6 of the funds earning the top ranking or “0” from FI360 an outside service that ranks mutual funds and ETFs based upon 11 criteria.

Further, of the 19 underlying funds used across this target date series 17 had enough history to receive a 5 year Lipper ranking and 12 of those funds ranked in Lipper’s top quartile for the 5 years ended December 31, 2012.  This is a higher percentage than either Fidelity or Vanguard. 

Glide Path and Asset Classes

T. Rowe Price uses 12 asset classes in its TDFs; Vanguard uses 7; Fidelity uses 11.  This is not good or bad, but does reflect the broader approach employed by T. Rowe Price.  Note since the end of the year, Vanguard has added some funds in the fixed income area as well as some other tweaks.

T. Rowe Price’s Glide Path levels off at age 95 making it among the most aggressive of the target date fund families available.  By contrast Vanguard’s Glide Path levels off at age 72; Fidelity’s at age 80.  The Glide Path is the leveling off of the equity allocation of the fund as the investor moves into retirement and assumes that the investor will hold the fund until death; this may or may not be the case in reality.

Are Target Date Funds the Right Answer? 

As mentioned above, I have mixed feelings.  On the one hand TDFs are often a better solution than simply letting one’s retirement plan assets languish in a money market account.  On the other hand I am convinced that investors who are either comfortable doing their own allocation or who utilize an advisor are generally better served by tailoring an allocation from among the menu of investment choices offered in their 401(k) plan.

While I tend to favor Vanguard’s low cost passive approach, T. Rowe Price does an excellent job as well.  They have stuck to their knitting through the years and provide a solid option in the Target Date Fund space.

Check out Morningstar.com to look under the hood of T. Rowe’s Target Date Funds and to compare them against other alternatives that you might be considering.  Get a free trial for their premium services.

Please feel free to contact me with questions regarding your investments and your retirement planning issues.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday Finance Links February 8, 2013 – Blizzard Edition

Share

Newsflash it’s February.  We finally got some real measurable snow in the Midwest; I think we have received 7 or so inches here in Chicago’s Northwest suburbs.  Good luck to our friends on the East Coast this weekend with the severe blizzard that is forecast.

Here are a few links to some great weekend financial reading.   

Personal Finance Blogs  

Miranda asks Is Your Income Information for Sale? at Cash Money Life.

Mike urges us to Beware of Backtested Market-Beating Strategies at Oblivious Investor.

Kay explains that Casinos’ tax contributions extend beyond Super Bowl wagers at Don’t Mess With Taxes. 

Posts from Fellow NAPFA Members  

Lon Jeffries asks Should You Delay Taking Social Security? at Figuide.com.

Robert Schmansky explains Bond Laddering: Generating Income From Your Portfolio at Figuide.com.   

Other financial articles from around the web 

Christine Benz shares How to Invest RMD’s You Don’t Need at morningstar.com.

Josh Charlson tells us that Morningstar is Bringing the Morningstar Analyst Rating to Target-Date Series at morningstar.com.

Dan Solin explains The Hidden Danger of Being a Sophisticated Investor  at usnews.com.

In case you missed it here is my latest post for the US News Smarter Investor Blog Should You Switch to a Roth 401(k)? 

Here’s wishing everyone a great weekend.

Photo credit:  Flickr

Enhanced by Zemanta

Target Date Funds Don’t Guarantee Retirement Success

Share

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal professional edition was entitled “Target” Funds Still Missing the Mark. The premise of the article was that Target Date Funds were falling short in their investment returns and were doing nothing to help 401(k) participants regain some of the ground they had lost during the 2008-09 stock market decline.  Another Wall Street Journal Article in early 2011 cited an Alliance Bernstein survey of 1,000 workers which over half “mistakenly believed that using target-date funds would guarantee that their retirement income needs will be met.”

As both a financial planner working with individual investors and as an advisor to several 401(k) plan sponsors I find this survey result appalling and disturbing.  Moreover, it reinforces my concerns that 401(k) participants as well as some plan sponsors really don’t understand the pros and cons of Target Date Funds.

The fund companies offering them would be the first to tell you that there is nothing guaranteed about TDFs. There is a growing movement within the retirement plan space to add guaranteed-income products to Target Date Funds, but this won’t guarantee retirement success either.

Is a Target Date Fund the right choice for you?

The key to determining if a Target Date Fund is the right choice for your retirement savings is to understand them.  If you are considering a TDF for all or part of your 401(k) account or as an investment in general, here are two things to consider:

  • Target Date Funds from various providers with the same target date may vary widely as to their asset allocation and investment approach. There is no requirement that a TDF with a given target date have any particular allocation to equities, fixed income, etc.  The fund with the target date closest to your intended retirement might not be the best fund for your needs. As with any investment, you need to look at the fund’s investment allocation in light of your financial goals, risk tolerance, etc. You should also look at the fund as a part of your overall portfolio if you have investments outside of your retirement plan, such as IRAs, taxable accounts, a spouse’s retirement plan, and the like.
  • Many Target Date Funds are funds of the mutual fund company’s funds. This is the case for Vanguard, Fidelity, and T. Rowe Price, which collectively have about 80 percent of the TDF assets. This is not good or bad, but you should take a look at the funds that make up the TDF that you are considering. In some cases, I’ve seen fund companies use funds other than what I consider to be their top funds; perhaps they are looking to add assets to these funds.

Target Date Funds gather a huge amount of assets for the fund companies offering them, both as a component in many 401(k) plans and as a rollover vehicle when participants leave their employer.  Remember your investment choices should be all about you and what’s right for your situation.

Most of all, remember that the biggest single determinant in retirement success is the amount saved. If you start early, save as much as you can, have a financial plan in place, and make good investment choices, you will give yourself a good shot at accumulating enough to fund your retirement.  There are no guarantees of course.

Please feel free to contact me with questions about 401(k) plan and about your retirement planning needs.

Check out our Resources page for links to a variety of tools and services that might be beneficial to you.

Photo credit:  Wikipedia

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday Finance Links January 18, 2013

Share

Football season ended with a thud last week, the Packers defense laid a major egg. I hope they get the D fixed by next season.   On a more exciting note, our son will be singing the national anthem prior to the Northern Illinois basketball game tomorrow night.

Here is some great weekend financial reading.  

Personal Finance Blogs  

Miranda shares 8 Places to Research Your Potential House Before You Buy a Home at Free From Broke.

Kevin outlines 2013 Health Care Reform – Changes You Need to Know at Cash Money Life.

Carrie shares The Ultimate Lost of Tools and Resources for Successful Online Entrepreneurs at Careful Cents.

Joe tells us How to start contributing to a Roth IRA at Retire by 40. 

Posts from Fellow NAPFA Members  

Rick Epple shares 7 Steps To Financial Independence For The Small Business Owner at Figuide.com.

Claire Emory tells us that Retiring Abroad Requires Retirement Planning at Figuide.com.  

Other financial articles from around the web  

Josh Charlson explains that Diversification Pays Off for Target-Date Funds  at morningstar.com.

Jonathan Burton suggests 5 money moves to cushion a bond-market meltdown  at marketwatch.com.

Scott Holsopple tells us How to Pick the Right Annuity (If One Is Right for You) at usnews.com.

In case you missed it here is my latest post for the US News Smarter Investor Blog Why Financial Planning Matters. 

Here’s wishing everyone a great weekend.

Photo credit:  Flickr

Enhanced by Zemanta

Merry Christmas and Thank You

Share

I want to wish all of you who celebrate a Merry Christmas and to everyone a happy and prosperous 2013.  I also want to thank all of you for your readership and support.

Since moving The Chicago Financial Planner to Word Press from Blogger in June, my readership has steadily increased and again I want to thank you for that.  Here are my top 5 most read blog posts since the conversion:

How much is Financial Advice Worth? was born out of a discussion with a financial advisor colleague about a new 401(k) advice service we were trying to launch for 401(k) participants.  I asked “So how much is competent, unbiased financial advice worth?  Part of the answer lies in the benefit that you expect to receive from spending the money.”

401(k) Fee Disclosure and the American Funds was written on the heels of the initial fee disclosures for 401(k) participants mandated by new regulations this year.  I used the multiple retirement plan share classes offered by the American Funds to illustrate the need for plan participants to understand these fee disclosures and the details of the funds offered in their plan’s lineup.

Why Financial Planning is Important-An Illustration is based upon and excellent infographic offered by NAPFA a professional organization of fee-only financial advisors of which I am a member.  The infographic does a great job of diagramming the need for financial planning and how the process works.  The statistics are sobering and illustrate the need for many Americans to seek the help of a qualified financial planner.

Target Date Funds-A Look Under the Hood looks at the composition of the “Big 3” Target Date Fund families:  Vanguard, Fidelity, and T. Rowe Price.  Together these three families control about 80% of the assets invested in Target Date Funds.  Target Date Funds are a staple in 401(k) and similar retirement plans.  They are frequently used as the default option for participants who don’t specify an investment choice.  However, like any investment, it is important that you understand how these funds will be investing your money and if their approach is right for you.

Can I Retire?  is the question that I am most often asked by perspective clients.  Can I Retire?  This is not a simple question to answer.  Moreover it’s not just about being able to retire, but rather can you retire “in style?”

Again I want to thank you my readers for your support and for your readership.  My question to you is how can I be of help?  What questions are on your mind?  Please use the contact form to let me know and I will do my best to answer them.

Also please feel free to let me know what you like or don’t like about The Chicago Financial Planner.  Your thoughts are important to me.

We will continue to evolve the blog into 2013 and look for ways to offer you more information about financial planning, investments, retirement plans, and related topics.

I hope that all of you have a wonderful holiday season.

Photo credit:  Wikipedia

Enhanced by Zemanta

5 Timeless 401(k) Investing Tips

Share

We have a looming Fiscal Cliff, we have infantile politicians bickering about it, and we have Jim Cramer screaming and ranting about whatever.  In this environment, here are my best tips for 401(k) investors (a hint these are the same tips I would have offered if this was 2011 or 2010, or most any other year):

Stick with it

During the 2008-2009 market decline, many 401(k) participants lowered their deferral rates or stopped salary deferrals altogether. Clearly those participants who stuck with their salary deferrals and their investment strategy throughout are generally happy with the results given the market’s performance over the past three years. The point is that consistent savings and sticking with a plan plays a key role in accumulating 401(k) assets for retirement over time.

Contribute as much as you can 

I’ve read many studies pertaining to retirement success.  Virtually all of them cite the amount saved over one’s working life as the single biggest factor in achieving a financially successful retirement.  At the very least make sure you are contributing enough to earn any match offered by your employer.

View your 401(k) as part of your overall portfolio

Far too many participants view their 401(k) accounts in a vacuum. The better approach is to treat this as a part of your overall portfolio. Your outside investments might include a spouse’s retirement plan, various IRAs, old 401(k) accounts left at former employers, taxable accounts, various individual stocks and bonds, and other investments such as rental property. The point is to view your 401(k) account in light your overall portfolio and allocate your holdings accordingly. 

Don’t ignore your 401(k)

There were many stories during 2008-2009 about 401(k) participants who couldn’t bear to open their account statements. Part of the reason that the participants who stuck with their plan did so much better according to a Fidelity study was due to the fact that they bought shares at lower prices during the market decline and then benefited from the ensuing rally that started in March of 2009. As painful as it is, review your account at regular intervals and rebalance when holdings fall outside the target allocation range you have set. Even better if your plan offers automatic rebalancing, take advantage of it.

Use Target-Date Funds with caution

The concept of Target Date Funds is great.  Invest in the fund with a target date closest to your projected retirement date. The manager adjusts the level of stocks as you get closer to the target date. Participants get professional management of their investments. The reality is that different funds from different families with the same target date often have widely different allocations and levels of investment risk. The quality of the underlying funds differs among various fund families. If this route seems attractive to you, it is vital that you review the Target Date Funds offered by your plan. Don’t automatically default to the fund with the target date closest to your projected retirement, rather look at the allocation of the various funds in the series and pick the one that best fits your situation. Also look under the hood at the fund’s underlying investments and be sure you understand how the fund invests your hard-earned money.  This extends to all aspects of the fund including the fund’s glide path into retirement.  Personally I like Target Date Funds for younger workers who might not have much in the way of outside investments; I’m not a fan for investors within 15 or so years of retirement.  These folks need to have a portfolio and a financial plan that are working in harmony.

Your 401(k) can be a great retirement savings vehicle. Like any other investment, it does take work to ensure that your savings are working hard for your retirement.

Please feel free to contact me with questions about your 401(k) plan and your retirement planning needs.

Photo credit:  Flickr

Enhanced by Zemanta

Vanguard Target Date Funds – A Look Under The Hood

Share

I’ve written several posts on Target Date Funds for this blog.  I have mixed feelings about them.  On the one hand TDFs do

Vanguard

provide investors with a professionally managed all-in-one investment solution.  Ideally you invest in the fund with a target date closest to your anticipated retirement date and the fund does the rest.  The manager typically lightens up on equities over time until the fund reaches its Glide Path into retirement, which is a point where the equity allocation levels off and you “glide” into retirement.

This is great in theory, but the reality is that across various fund families TDFs with the same target date can vary widely in their allocations and as to when the Glide Path starts.  Personally I like TDFs more for younger investors versus those who are within say 15 years or so of retirement.  Target Date Funds have become a staple in 401(k) plans due to the safe harbor given to plan sponsors who use them as the default investment choice for those plan participants who do not make an election of their own.

Fidelity, T. Rowe Price, and Vanguard control about 80% of the TDFs assets.  Let’s take a look under the hood at the Vanguard Target Retirement funds.

Vanguard offers funds with target dates beginning in 2010 and going out to 2060 in five year increments.  Additionally they offer an Income version of the fund for those already in retirement.

Low Cost and Simple

Vanguard’s approach is both simple and low cost.  The underlying funds consist mostly of Vanguard’s low cost index funds.  The overall expense ratio of the funds is a weighted rollup of the underlying funds and currently ranges from 0.17% to 0.19%.  This is far less expensive than either Fidelity or T. Rowe Price and each of the Vanguard funds ranks in the top (lowest expense) percentile of their respective peer categories.

Solid Performance

  • Each of the funds from the 2010 through the 2050 fund received a top ranking from Fi 360 a mutual fund and ETF ranking service that I utilize in their most recent rankings through the quarter ended September 30, 2012.
  • The Retirement Income fund received a score of 6 from Fi 360 meaning that it ranked in the top 6% of the 211 funds in its category based upon the 11 ranking criteria used by the service.
  • The 2055 and 2060 funds do not have enough history to receive a ranking.

Glide Path and Asset Classes

Vanguard uses 7 asset classes in its TDFs; Fidelity uses 11; T. Rowe Price uses 12.  This is not good or bad, but does reflect Vanguard’s more basic approach.

Vanguard’s Glide Path levels off at age 72; Fidelity’s at age 80; T. Rowe Price’s at age 95.  The Glide Path assumes that the investor will hold the fund until death; this may or may not be the case in reality.

Are Target Date Funds the Right Answer? 

As mentioned above, I have mixed feelings.  On the one hand TDFs are often a better solution than simply letting one’s retirement plan assets languish in a money market account.  On the other hand I am convinced that investors who are either comfortable doing their own allocation or who utilize an advisor are generally better served by tailoring an allocation from among the menu of investment choices offered in their 401(k) plan.

As far as Target Date Funds go, I generally like the Vanguard version for their basic, easy to understand approach and their low cost.

Check out Morningstar to look under the hood of Vanguard’s Target Date Funds and to compare them against other alternatives that you might be considering.  Get a  free trial for their premium services.

Please feel free to contact me with questions regarding your investments and your retirement planning issue.

Photo credit:  Flickr

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday Finance Links October 5, 2012

Share

Looks like there will be a bit of a nip in the air this weekend; fall is upon us here in Chicago.  Can winter and snow blowingThumbnail for version as of 14:19, 5 September 2012 the driveway be far behind?  Good excuse (like I needed one) to plant myself on the couch and catch the Packers on Sunday.

Here are some articles and blog posts that I suggest for your weekend personal finance reading: 

Personal Finance Blogs

Phil Taylor looks at the issue Should You Payoff the Mortgage (s) Early? at PT Money.

Hank Coleman tells us Why Your Stay At Home Spouse Needs Life Insurance at Money Q&A.

Kevin Mulligan discusses the Disadvantages of Target Date Retirement Funds at Cash Money Life.

Posts from Fellow NAPFA members

Don Martin shows us the Best Way To Buy Bonds at FiGuide.com.

Anthony Farella writes about 401(k) Disclosure Coming To Your Statement at FiGuide.com.

Other articles from around the web

Chuck Jaffe provides 6 reasons to dump a bad mutual fund at Market Watch.com.

Kimberly Palmer tells us How to Market Your Business Online at usnews.com.

Aaron Pressman discussed Vanguard’s recent decision to switch index providers Vanguard dumps MSCI indexes from 22 funds to cut costs at MSN Money.

Phillip Moeller says that Estate-Tax Changes Would Affect More Than the Super Rich at usnews.com.

In case you missed it here is my latest post for the US News Smarter Investor Blog Using the “Four Percent Rule” for Retirement Planning. 

Here’s wishing everyone a great weekend.  

Photo credit:  Flickr

Enhanced by Zemanta

Target Date Funds – A Look under the Hood

Share
Asset Allocation on Wikibook

The Pension Protection Act of 2006 made Target Date Funds the default investment option of choice in many 401(k)

plans.  As of March, nearly 25% of all 401(k) participants invest solely in TDFs representing a 6 fold increase in six years according to Vanguard via research for plans they manage.  Vanguard goes on to say that 64% of new plan participants entering a plan for the first time contributed 100% to a single TDF.

When you invest in a Target Date Fund, where is your money going?  Here is a comparison of the TDF series offered by the “Big 3” Vanguard, Fidelity, and T. Rowe Price who control about 80% of the Target Date Fund assets.

Fund Basics

Fidelity

T. Rowe Price

Vanguard

Number of underlying mutual funds

23

19

5

Glide Path end age

80

95

72

Active/passive focus

Active (89%)

Active (85%)

Passive (97%)

Expense ratio-avg.

0.64%

0.70%

0.18%

Information via Lipper and Morningstar

Looking at some of the basics from the chart above:

  • All three families are funds of funds comprised exclusively of their own mutual funds.
    • Fidelity and T. Rowe Price both use a higher number of undying funds as compared to Vanguard.
    • Vanguard’s funds are lower cost due to their focus on passively managed index funds.
  • Vanguard and T. Rowe Price use the same underlying funds that are generally available to investors.  Fidelity has moved in large part to the use of their Series funds, a group of institutionally managed funds designed for use only in their Target Date Funds.
  • Glide path refers to the leveling out of the allocation to equities in the funds as shareholders move into retirement.  All three funds are “through” retirement rather than ‘to” retirement.  In the latter case the glide path would level off around age 65.
  • T. Rowe Price has among the longest glide paths of all TDF families.  As you can see above, Fidelity and Vanguard level off a bit earlier.  A point about the glide path.  The fund companies assume that you will hold the TDFs through retirement and perhaps until death.  You might or might not do this, if you don’t the glide path does not make as much difference.

A look at the asset classes used by each TDF family shows some additional differences

Asset Class Summary

Fidelity

T. Rowe Price

Vanguard

U.S. Large Cap

X

X

X

U. S. Mid Cap

X

X

X

U.S. Small Cap

X

X

X

International Equity

X

X

X

Emerging Markets Equity

X

X

X

U.S. Fixed Income

X

X

X

U.S. TIPs

X

X

X

High Yield Fixed Inc.

X

X

International Fixed Income

X

Emerging Mkts Debt

X

X

REITs

X

X

Commodities

X

X

Source:  Lipper 

As you can see from the chart above, Fidelity and T. Rowe Price have ventured into a number of non-core asset classes.  The allocations to any of these asset classes of course vary based on the allocation of the particular TDF.

Vanguard has chosen to take the approach of building their asset allocation models across the various target dates using a simpler approach with just five funds across seven asset classes.

According to Morningstar both T. Rowe Price and Vanguard are ranked “Top.”  Morningstar uses a five rank system.  Fidelity’s Freedom Funds are ranked as “Average” the middle ranking.  This is as of June 30, 2012.

Target Date Funds are a staple in 401(k) and similar retirement plans.  As mentioned above they are frequently used as the default option for participants who don’t specify an investment choice.

As far as choosing which family of TDFs to use, you generally won’t have a choice in your 401(k).  Understand, however, that TDFs can generally be used outside of retirement plans.  For example all of the “Big 3” actively court rollovers from the retirement plans they manage for participants who are leaving the plan for whatever reason.

Besides the fund of proprietary funds approach used by these three families, there are Target Date Funds out there using ETFs and other vehicles as the underlying investments.

Should you go the Target Date route?  Here are a few factors to consider:

  • Are you comfortable allocating your retirement account from among the other options available in the plan?
  • Are there advice options available to you via your retirement plan?  These might include online options; in-person individualized sessions; or managed account options.
  • Do you work with a financial advisor on your accounts outside of the plan?  If so the advisor might be in a position to provide advice on your 401(k) account.  In any event these assets should be considered by your advisor in the course of the advice they provide to you.

If you decide that the Target Date Fund route is the best route for your situation, here are a few things to consider:

  • Pick the fund that best fits your unique situation; this may or may not be the fund with the target date closest to your anticipated retirement date.
  • Target Date Funds are not a “set it and forget it” option.  There, in my opinion, is no such investing option for your 401(k) or any other account.  You need to monitor your TDF choice and understand how your money is being invested.  Fund companies can change managers, investment philosophies, etc.  You are responsible for your retirement and need to stay on top of it.
  • The use of a TDF does not guarantee retirement savings success.  The biggest determinant here is the amount saved during your working life.  Make sure that you are maximizing the amount you are able to contribute to your plan.
  • TDFs do not lower investment risk; this is a function of how the fund is allocated and the skill of the investment manager.  Just ask holders of many 2010 dated funds back in 2008.
  • You need to understand how the allocation of the TDF you choose will fit with your other investments, whether other funds in the 401(k) or your outside accounts such as IRAs and taxable brokerage accounts.

While I’m not a huge fan of Target Date Funds, they can be a sound alternative for many 401(k) investors.  Make sure you have researched this and all options available via your 401(k) plan to determine if this is truly the best option for you.  Check out morningstar.com to analyze your Target Date Fund choices and all of your 401(k) options, and to get a free trial for their premium services.

If you have a choice of Target Date Fund families remember to look “under the hood” of each because there are differences in approach, the types of underlying investments, and costs.  There are also differences in the allocation and risk of funds from difference families with the same target date.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have about your 401(k) plan or with regard to your overall financial planning needs.

 

Photo credit:  Wikipedia

 

Enhanced by Zemanta