Information about financial planning, investments, and retirement plans

Your Stockbroker is Not Your Friend

Share

This is a guest post from Bob Richards, the publisher of The Retirement Income Blog.

Your broker may seem like he wants to help you make money and odds are he does.  Unfortunately, he works in a system that decreases the possibility he can help you.

Your Broker Does Not Give You the Best Advice

English: File depicts image from the official ...

Your broker has positioned himself as your advisor, someone acting in your interest.  However, this is not always so.  If he works for a large firm, that firm issues his paycheck and he is beholden to that firm.  Say he works for ABC Financial.  Notice that he often recommends the mutual funds or annuities created by ABC Financial.  This allows his firm to not only get a commission when you buy the fund but also fees for managing the fund.  So even though there may be better-performing funds he can recommend, he is under no obligation to do so.  His legal obligation is only to sell you what is suitable, not what is best.  And he often recommends “packaged products” such as mutual funds, annuities, or wrap accounts rather than individual stocks and bonds.  It is much easier for his firm to bury high fees in a packaged product.

You Broker May Not be Competent 

In order to become a broker (now called financial advisors at many firms), one must take a test.  The exam is like most exams—you memorize a bunch of information and then regurgitate it.  The test is multiple-choice.  Any intelligent 12-year-old can pass the exam. In fact, many brokers attend a 40-hour cram course the week prior to the exam as their only preparation. Furthermore, the exam tests knowledge about rules and regulations and almost nothing about what it takes to help you make money.  From my experience as a former branch manager for a major brokerage firm, about 80% of the brokers know very little about the market or the investments they sell. The other 20% may have actually taken investment management, economics and finance classes in school but this is not a prerequisite for becoming a broker.   Alternatively, the 20% who are knowledgeable may have educated themselves.

Your broker sells you offerings he may not understand.  Investments come with a prospectus.  I have never met a broker who read the prospectus of the investments sold. The way he often learns about the investments is by attending a luncheon given by a wholesaler (a sales person to sales people) who provides the sales talking points for the broker to incorporate in his pitch.  Because the broker cannot distinguish between a “good” and “bad” investment, he generally sells what his firm recommends. 

A Better Investment Professional

Very few investors realize that there are two types of professionals in the investment business. I have described so far a registered representative, the technical term for a stockbroker who sells investments and earns commission. There is another type of investment professional called a registered investment advisor. This person has obtained a license that permits him to give investment advice for a fee. He won’t sell you something and earn a commission (though some brokers and registered reps are both sales people and registered investment advisors via their firms). He will give you advice in return for payment. He is also legally responsible to you as a fiduciary. The definition of fiduciary duty:

“A fiduciary duty is the highest standard of care at either equity or law. A fiduciary (abbreviation fid) is expected to be extremely loyal to the person to whom he owes the duty (the “principal”): he must not put his personal interests before the duty, and must not profit from his position as a fiduciary, unless the principal consents.”

The way that most registered investment advisors work is that they manage your investment portfolio for a percentage of the assets for which they are providing advice (e.g. 1% of the portfolio value would be $1,000 annually on a $100,000 portfolio). Because of the way they are compensated, they have no motivation to sell you this stock, that stock, that mutual fund or this bond. Their motivation is to retain you as a client and to make your account grow. Only in this way can they make more money from you by helping you grow a larger investment nest egg from which they can collect their 1%. Yet others simply work hourly much like an accountant or an attorney or via a fixed retainer. Again, they have no incentive to sell you the product-du-jour as does a broker.

Advice for Selecting an Investment Professional

So here’s the advice I’d like to give every investor.

  • Do not buy packaged products because unless you read the 80 page prospectus, you are likely being ripped off in terms of high fees.
  • Buy individual stocks and bonds and no load mutual funds which you must buy on your own because commission brokers don’t sell them.
  • Either deal with a registered investment advisor who will charge you fees and not commissions or you’ll need to learn enough about investing to do it yourself.

This is a guest post from Bob Richards, the publisher of The Retirement Income Blog.

Please feel free to contact me with your investing and financial planning questions.  Check out our Financial Planning and Investment Advice for Individuals page to learn more about our services.  

Please check out our Resources page for links to some additional tools and services that might be beneficial to you.  

Photo credit:  Wikipedia

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Investing: Even Indexing Takes Work

Share
INDEX IIM Lucknow Logo

The benefits of low-cost index mutual funds and ETFs are all over the news.  They were front and center in the recent PBS Frontline Special The Retirement Gamble.  Index funds are a great tool for investors of all ages; in many cases these passively managed funds beat the majority of their actively managed peers within the same investment style.  However, investing in index funds takes work, especially with the proliferation of new index products that continue to hit the marketplace.

Expenses matter 

Costs matter when investing.  One of the biggest lures of index fund investing is that many of these products provide a low cost way to investment in a given segment of the market.  If you are looking for an index fund that mimics the S&P 500 there are many great low cost alternatives such as the Vanguard 500 Index Fund (Ticker VFINX) with an expense ratio of 0.17% or the SPDR S&P 500 Index ETF (Ticker SPY) with an expense ratio of 0.09%.  On the other hand, there is also the Rydex S&P 500 A (Ticker RYSOX) with its expense ratio of 1.51%.  How big of a deal is this difference?

A $10,000 investment in the Vanguard 500 fund made on May 31, 2006 and held until May 15, 2013 would now be worth $15,064.  That same investment in the Rydex S&P 500 fund would be worth $13,798 or 9.2% less for an investment in a mutual fund tracking the same index as the Vanguard fund. 

Understand the underlying index 

In the wake of the 2008-2009 market downturn new index products, especially in the ETF space, have proliferated.  ETF providers are falling all over themselves to bring new index products to the market hoping to attract assets.  Like any investment, investing in an index fund or ETF requires that you understand what it is that you are buying.

When I think of indexing I think of the traditional, basic index products that track benchmarks such as the S&P 500, the total U.S. stock market, the total non-U.S. market, the domestic bond market, etc.  Additionally I typically use index funds to benchmark the U.S. small and mid cap equity spaces, real estate, and emerging markets equity among others.

Several months ago Market Watch’s Chuck Jaffe cited a Vanguard report that found “1,400 U.S. listed ETFs track more than 1,000 different indexes. But more than half of these benchmarks had existed for less than six months before an ETF came along to track it.”  

As an investor this should be a huge red flag.  What this study says is that many of these new index products were developed much like the monster in the Mel Brook’s classic Young Frankenstein.  Look back-testing is not inherently bad and many of these new index products are appropriate for professional traders.  However if you are looking to index in the fashion that Vanguard founder John Bogle and others espouse then you should consider sticking with index products that track known, battle-tested market benchmarks.

Asset allocation is still vital 

Whether you use index products as a portion of your overall portfolio in conjunction with other investment vehicles such as actively managed mutual funds or individual stocks, or if you invest in index funds exclusively you still need to develop and asset allocation for your portfolio.  As I say frequently on this blog, this should be done as an outgrowth of your financial plan.

Even a seemingly simple strategy of investing in a total U.S. stock market fund, a total international stock market fund, and a total bond market fund still requires that you determine how much to invest in each fund, that you monitor your allocation and rebalance when needed, and that you review and adjust your target allocation as you age or if your situation changes.

Index funds and ETFs are a great investment tool.  Like any tool it is important that you select the right index product and that you manage your portfolio properly.

Please feel free to contact me with your investing and financial planning questions.  Check out our Financial Planning and Investment Advice for Individuals page to learn more about our services.  

For you do-it-yourselfers, check out Morningstar.com to analyze your index mutual fund and ETF options and to get a free trial for their premium services.  Please check out our Resources page for links to some additional tools and services that might be beneficial to you.  

Photo credit:  Wikipedia

Enhanced by Zemanta

Winning The Retirement Gamble: Step 1 Adjust Your Mindset

Share
Tri-Athletes Mental Tool Box -- F.A.S.T.

The PBS Frontline documentary The Retirement Gamble has sparked a lot of discussion, both pro and con.  One thing that is clear, the show contributed to the discussion about the lack of retirement readiness among many in the United States.  I’m hardly an expert in behavioral finance, but I do know that in order for investors to be able to focus on planning for their retirement they need to adopt  the right mindset.

Lose the victim mentality

I saw a lot of this on the PBS special and see this written about frequently in the press.  The last few years especially have been rough on many of us saving for retirement.  Job losses; the financial crises; the Flash Crash; the realization that not all financial advisors have their client’s best interests at heart; the mutual fund scandals of the middle part of the last decade might all be good excuses to feel like a victim.

As my wife used to say to our kids on the soccer field (when they had a minor injury) “…suck it up and get back in the game…”  If you feel like a victim you likely will end up as one.  Right or wrong saving for retirement is on you, deal with it.

Drink your own flavor of Kool Aid 

I love index funds and ETFs and use them extensively throughout my practice.  They comprise the majority of the assets for which I provide advice.  I don’t, however, use passive index products exclusively.  There are solid actively managed funds that in my opinion warrant inclusion in some client portfolios.

There are some folks out there who have an almost cult-like devotion to indexing and John Bogle.  Mr. Bogle deserves all of the respect and admiration that he gets and then some.  My point is that no single way of doing things is always right in all cases.  It’s OK to mix and match funds, ETFs, active, and passive strategies, as well as other vehicles as long as they fit your financial plan and your needs.  Don’t let anyone put you down because you disagree with their way of doing things.

Focus on the future, don’t dwell on the past 

The past is in the books.  Maybe you didn’t save enough perhaps you invested in all of the wrong places.  Perhaps you had a greedy “financial guy” whose focus was on selling you products that enriched their bottom line at your expense.  Don’t forget your past mistakes, learn from them, but don’t dwell on them.

All you can do in the financial planning and investing world is move forward from wherever you are now.

  • Find a fee-only financial advisor who puts your interests first.
  • Get a financial plan in place with appropriate goals and strategies.
  • Review your investing strategy.
  • Beef up your retirement savings.
  • Manage your career.
  • Take charge

Our retirement savings system puts the responsibility for accumulating enough for retirement on us.  Get in the game make sure you have the right mindset and attitude to be successful.

Please feel free to contact me with your financial planning and investing questions.  Check out our Financial Planning and Investment Advice for Individuals page to learn more about our services.  

For you do-it-yourselfers, check out Morningstar.com to analyze your investment holdings and your portfolio. Please click on the link to get a free trial for their premium services.  Please check out our Resources page for links to some additional tools and services that might be beneficial to you. 

Photo credit:  Flickr

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday Finance Links May 3, 2013 – Dow 15,000 Edition

Share
English: A view from the Member's Gallery insi...

Today the Dow Jones Industrial Average crossed the 15,000 mark for the first time.  Who knows where it will end the day.  What does this mean to you?  It shouldn’t mean anything if you invest according to a coherent plan, other than perhaps that you may need to review and if needed rebalance your portfolio.

Here are a few links to some great weekend financial reading. 

Personal Finance Blogs

Emily compares the Pros and Cons of the 15 vs 30 Year Mortgage at PT Money.

Ken discusses Mutual Fund Expense Ratio: How Much Does It Hurt Investment Performance? at AAAMP Blog.

Kyle asks If Everybody Indexed, Would It Stop Working? at Amateur Asset Allocator.

Posts from Fellow NAPFA Members 

Fern Alix LaRocca warns us to avoid Refi Hell – I Almost Got Taken! at Figuide.com.

Lon Jeffries asks When Did You Last Review Your Insurance Coverage? at Figuide.com.   

Other financial articles from around the web

Andrea Coombes discusses The risks and costs of exotic investments at marketwatch.com.

Dan Solin says CNBC’s Ratings Decline is Bullish News for Investors at usnews.com.

In case you missed it here is my latest contribution to the US News Smarter Investor Blog Improving Your Odds in the ‘Retirement Gamble’.

Here’s wishing everyone a great weekend.  

Photo credit:  Wikipedia

Enhanced by Zemanta

Investing: 7 Steps to Spring Clean Your Portfolio

Share
Some beautiful flowers in the sun.

Spring time is traditionally the time to clean the garage and to get the yard in shape.  It’s also a great time to clean up your investment portfolio.  Here are 7 steps to a cleaner, more efficient portfolio.

Think of your investments as a portfolio

This is the first key step.  Many investors focus on each holding and fail to look at the sum of the parts.  Nobody is saying that investing in quality mutual fundsETFs, stocks, etc. is not important.  Start with your overall portfolio and determine if you are properly allocated in line with your financial goals and risk tolerance.  Ideally this would all be an extension of your financial plan.  Even younger investors starting out should think in terms of their overall portfolio, even if this is only a few holdings at this point. 

Find your most recent statements and organize your records 

Make sure that you receive and review statements from ALL investment accounts every time one is issued.  This might be monthly or quarterly depending upon your custodian and the type of account.  Keep them all in a file (paper and/or electronic) and more importantly find a way to take a consolidated, overall view of your holdings as a portfolio.  I enter all client accounts and holdings into a spreadsheet. I suggest categorizing your portfolio by account and by asset class (large cap, small cap, etc.).  At a minimum, this will show you how well you are diversified across different asset classes.  You might also be amazed at the number of individual holdings across all of these accounts, I call this financial clutter.  This is common among folks who might have a number of old 401(k) accounts at their former employers.  I had a client with almost 50 distinct holdings across multiple accounts when we started working together.  This is hard for anyone to track and monitor efficiently. 

Consolidate your accounts

To the extent possible, consolidate your accounts.  Unless there is a compelling reason to leave an old 401(k) with a former employer, monitoring your portfolio will be much easier if you roll these accounts into a consolidated IRA or even into your current employer’s 401(k) if allowed and the plan is a good one.  This also holds true if you have several IRA accounts with various custodians as well as for taxable accounts, annuities, etc.  

Review your asset allocation plan (or develop one)

This should happen before reviewing your individual investments so you aren’t influenced by your current allocation. As I’ve advocated here many times you need to have a financial plan in place before you decide upon an asset allocation strategy.  The financial plan should drive your investing activities, your allocation, and your choice of investments.  A well-constructed financial plan will help you focus on your risk-tolerance and your goals for the money you save and invest.

Review your current investment holdings

Have your stocks hit their sell targets? How do your mutual funds compare to their peers? It is important to establish a monitoring process for your individual holdings, and to review your holdings against appropriate benchmarks on a regular basis. If needed, make changes to your holdings if they no longer fit. 

Rebalance your portfolio 

You may need to buy and sell holdings or perhaps you can allocate new investment dollars to do this. Once you have determined that this is needed, you should get your allocation back in line as soon as possible to ensure that your allocation is consistent with the risk and return targets in your financial plan.  Remember your allocation should be reviewed across all of your various accounts.

Establish a regular process to review and monitor your portfolio 

Getting your portfolio in shape once does no good if you don’t establish a process to review your portfolio and your holdings on a regular basis.  This doesn’t mean looking at your investments daily or even weekly.  Depending upon your needs and your interest in doing this quarterly or semi-annually is sufficient for most.  At least annually this should be incorporated with a review of your financial plan to ensure that everything is in synch.

Please feel free to contact me with your financial planning and investing questions.  Check out our Financial Planning and Investment Advice for Individuals page to learn more about our services.  

For you do-it-yourselfers, check out Morningstar.com to analyze your investment holdings and your portfolio. Please click on the link to get a free trial for their premium services.  Please check out our Resources page for links to some additional tools and services that might be beneficial to you. 

Photo credit:  Wikipedia

Enhanced by Zemanta

ETFs or Mutual Funds? – Why Not Both?

Share
Diversification - Investing

Over the past several months I’ve read a number of articles along the lines of “ETFs vs. Mutual Funds.”  In most cases these articles take an either or position which is generally in favor of ETFs.  While I am a fan of ETFs and use them extensively in client portfolios, my question is why do we need to choose between ETFs and mutual funds?  Why not use both?

Looking over the portfolios of my individual clients I could not find one that did not include both ETFs and mutual funds.  In addition some include closed-end mutual funds as well as individual stocks.

Advantages of ETFs  

Originally ETFs were introduced as a way to trade various stock market indexes.  The S&P 500 SPDR (ticker SPY) just turned 20 and is generally at or near the top of the list in terms of ETF trading volume.  The availability of low cost ETFs across a variety of equity and fixed income indexes has mushroomed over the years.  As a financial advisor I use them extensively for their style consistency, low cost, and in many cases their consistently above average performance within their style peer groups.

Especially after the 2008-09 financial crisis the number of ETFs offered has mushroomed and so has the variety of offerings.  Actively managed ETFs are growing and the success of PIMco’s ETF version (ticker BOND) of its popular PIMco Total Return (ticker PTTRX) mutual fund will undoubtedly spur further growth here.

Why bother with Mutual Funds?

In looking at mutual funds you have to divide them into actively managed funds and passive (index) funds.

If you are indexing all or part of your portfolio you want to look at various factors in making your decision as to whether to go with a mutual fund or an ETF.  These include:

  • The size of your account/portfolio.  Even in the world of index mutual funds there are some lower cost versions available to investors who can meet higher minimum investment thresholds.  Vanguard is a good example here.
  • Cost to own.  The expense ratio should be the main factor, but transaction costs can come into play.  While the availability of no-transaction fee ETFs is growing, the ETF you want to buy may not be on this menu at a given custodian.  Likewise some mutual fund families might incur a transaction fee at certain custodians.
  • How will you invest?  If you are dollar cost averaging into a fund/ETF at say $250 per month you’ll want to look for options with no transaction costs.

While actively managed mutual funds get a bad rap in the press, there are still a number of well-managed reasonably priced funds across equity and fixed income styles.  A Schwab study a number of years ago touted a “core and explore” approach to investing.  This meant that the core of the portfolio would be index funds, with the use of actively managed funds in certain asset classes where good index products were not available.

Given the expansion of indexing to a wide range of assets classes in both the ETF and mutual fund format this approach in its original form may be passé.  However I still use a number of actively managed funds across both individual and institutional portfolios.

In choosing an active fund I’m looking for some or all of the following:

  • Long-term outperformance.
  • Superior risk-adjusted performance.
  • Consistency of management.
  • Something that I can’t find in an index product that adds to the overall quality of the portfolio.

Certainly there are a lot of mutual funds that don’t belong in your portfolio.  Loaded funds, proprietary funds from various brokerage houses and other high fee alternatives put a lot of money into your broker/registered rep’s pockets.  Go with no load funds and always shop for the most competitive share class available to you in terms of expense ratio.

Why exclude either ETFs or Mutual Funds?

My point here is not to argue the merits of either mutual funds or ETFs, or for that matter active management vs. passive.  Certainly I’ve seen some excellent examples of portfolios that are all ETF and/or all index products.

However why limit yourself and feel that you need to avoid funds or ETFs?  There are so many choices out there, I feel that I owe to my clients to look at the whole universe of ETFS, mutual funds, and other products that might enhance their portfolio and help them to achieve their investment goals.  In building a portfolio I suggest that you take the approach of picking the best investing vehicles for the various allocation “buckets” in your portfolio whether they be ETFs, mutual funds, actively managed, or passive index products.

Please feel free to contact me with your financial planning questions.  Check out our Financial Planning and Investment Advice for Individuals page for more information about our services.   

For you do-it-yourselfers, check out Morningstar.com to analyze your mutual funds, ETFs, and all of your investments and to get a free trial for their premium services.

Photo credit:  Flickr

Enhanced by Zemanta

Investing Seminars – Should You Attend?

Share

Today an invitation to an investment seminar came in the mail.  It said that the investment firm “… Cordially Invites You to Attend an EXCLUSIVE Dinner Gathering!”  Wow, me invited to anything that was exclusive?  The only brokerage sponsored investment “seminar” that I have ever attended featured legendary market guru Joseph Granville who among other things played the piano in his boxer shorts.

Opening the invitation, it was from a well-known brokerage firm.  The topic of the seminar is “Strategies for helping build a stronger portfolio.”  Among the areas to be covered are:

  • Outlook for Domestic/International Stock & Bond Markets
  • Focus on distributions:  strategies for managing your retirement income
  • Developing a systematic process to help GET and STAY on the right financial track
  • Strategies to help take advantage of upside market potential while planning for a possible downside

So far this all sounds great.  Reading on I noticed that while the session is sponsored by two advisors from the firm, the featured speakers were from a mutual fund company that offers funds that are often sold by commissioned reps and the other speaker was from an insurance company who is big in the world of annuities.

Should you attend? 

Clearly the brokers are ultimately out to sell financial products, this is reinforced by the choice of speakers.  That said there might be some good information available, the topics are certainly timely especially for Baby Boomers and retirees.

If you feel that you can resist a sales pitch, why not attend, again keep an open mind.  In the case of this session, the restaurant is a pretty good one that is close to my home.

On the other hand, what are you hoping to gain from attending?  These advisors are likely spending a fair amount of money on this session and expect a return on their investment.  There will be a good deal of sales pressure at the very least to schedule a follow-up session with them.

Think about your real objective 

If you want a good meal and perhaps a little bit of knowledge, why not attend?

On the other hand if you are serious about finding a financial advisor to guide you to and perhaps through retirement perhaps you should forego the meal and try to find someone who is a good fit for you.  Those of you who read this blog regularly know that I am a fee-only advisor, I strongly urge that you seek a fee-only advisor who sells only their knowledge and advice.   NAPFA (a professional organization for fee-only advisors of which I am a member) has published this excellent guide to finding a financial advisor.

A free meal is great, but in the end as they say, “… there are no free lunches…”

Please feel free to contact me with your financial planning questions.  Check out our Financial Planning and Investment Advice for Individuals page for more information about our services.  

Please check out our Resources page for links to some additional tools and services that might be beneficial to you.

Photo credit:  Flickr

Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday Finance Links March 22, 2013 – Go Marquette Edition

Share

March Madness is underway and my grad school alma matter Marquette pulled out an exciting opening round win over a tough number 14 seed, Davidson.  Butler is up next tomorrow, should be a great game.  I grew up rooting for Marquette as a kid in Milwaukee during the Al McGuire era.  They won it all in his last game as a coach in 1977 and were National runners-up in 1974.

Here are a few links to some great weekend financial reading. 

Personal Finance Blogs 

Andrea explains Mutual Fund Turnover Ratio: What You Need to Know to Pick a Fund at Take a Smart Step.

Angie tells us about Herd Mentality: You Are Being Set Up to Fail in a guest post at Value Stock Guide.

Robert shows us How to Understand the Stock Market at The Collge Investor.

Jon explains What Is Preferred Stock? at Novel Investor.

Thanks to John at Frugal Rules for featuring my guest post Financial Advisor Compensation – Why it Matters.

If you are an aspiring blogger or an experienced blogger looking for a few tips check out Jeremy’s new page Guide to Starting a Blog at his blog Modest Money.

Posts from Fellow NAPFA Members 

Tom Orecchio shares a Financial Planning Overview at Figuide.com.

Jim Blankenship discusses the Adoption Credit For Tax Year 2012 And Beyond at Figuide.com.

Other financial articles from around the web

Jeanette Pavini tells us how Anti-aging scams can be costly and dangerous at marketwatch.com.

Tom Sightings lays out 7 Steps to Independence in Retirement at usnews.com.

Dan Solin explains why FINRA’s Win is Your Loss at usnews.com.

I took a week off from contributing to US News Smarter Investor Blog but you can check out all of my prior posts at my author page.

Here’s wishing everyone a great weekend.

Photo credit:  Flickr

Enhanced by Zemanta

Greed is Good – What if Gordon Gekko was a Financial Advisor?

Share

A recent LinkedIn group discussion about the use of C Share mutual funds caused me to comment that the advisor in question must have been Gordon Gekko.  This made me wonder what the fictional Mr. Gekko would be like if he came to life as a financial advisor.

For those of you who may not know, Gordon Gekko is the Investment Banker from the film Wall Street played by Michael Douglas who uttered the immortal phase, “Greed, for lack of a better word, is good” at the shareholder’s meeting of a company that he was attempting to take over.

Compensation Structure 

I’m pretty certain that Gekko would not embrace the fee-only compensation structure with its transparency and lack of revenue from the sale of financial products.  Rather I suspect he would gravitate to either the commission or fee-based structures.  Certainly his slicked-back hair and big cuff-links would fit the stereo type of the financial advisor as a producer model.   

Load mutual funds 

I’m guessing that Gekko would love the high cost B Share mutual funds and would be doing everything he could to keep clients in this share class as long as he could.  Overall he would like favor share classes with some sort of sales load in order to increase his income.  No low cost index fund or ETF recommendations from Mr. Gekko.

High cost Variable Annuities 

Gekko would likely suggest that you buy one of the many high cost variable annuities that make him a ton of money and may have questionable results for you his client.  There is nothing wrong with variable annuities; in fact they can be a viable solution for some clients.  What is objectionable is the way these products are often sold and the high cost versions of these products that are generally pushed by fee-based and commissioned reps.  You will never hear them touting low cost, no surrender charge versions of this product that are offered by Vanguard and others.

Life insurance is a goldmine 

Life insurance is a key component in the financial plans of many folks and rightly so.  Life insurance can provide an easy way for a family to build an estate quickly and can help protect their lifestyle should the primary breadwinner die before accumulating a sufficient level of wealth.  Inexpensive term life insurance generally provides the best approach to life insurance.

I doubt that Mr. Gekko would see things this way.  In order for him to realize a big payday from selling you a policy,  some sort of cash value policy such as whole life, universal life, variable life, or some variation would likely fit the bill. He might try to sell you on the value of the policy as an investment or as a retirement savings vehicle.  While there are instances where a cash value policy makes sense, be very skeptical if your agent or financial advisor really pushes one of these products.  Make them show you a realistic illustration.  I’ve actually seen policy illustrations using a 12% annual rate of return.   12%, really?  Oh yes, greed is good I forgot.

Equity Index Annuities 

Whenever I’ve written a post in any way suggesting Equity Index Annuities are not the best alternative for the Baby Boomers and retirees, I receive a fair amount of negative comments that range from disagreement to questioning my knowledge of finance.  This leads me to believe that my comments are right on the money.

Mr. Gekko would especially love the fear-mongering approach that is often used to sell EIAs after a market downturn.  Given the popularity of these products among the financial sales crowd I have to assume the payouts are generous, making this product a natural fit for Mr. Gekko.

Gekko’s approach to the 401(k) world 

If Gekko offered 401(k) plans as part of his practice he’d likely love the high cost group annuity plans offered by many insurance companies.  The worst event from his point of view is the recent 401(k) disclosures mandated by the government.   I wonder if Gekko would even be able to spell the word Fiduciary.

Greed is good as long as greed it is pursued in an ethical fashion and on behalf of an advisor’s clients.  I’m also not saying that every advisor who is paid all or in part via commissions from the sale of financial products is a bad advisor.  Clearly, however, the fee-only model starts with fewer potential conflicts of interest for the advisor.

Gordon Gekko is one of the best movie characters of all-time in my opinion.  Let’s be glad that he is just a fictional character and not a practicing financial advisor.

Please feel free to contact me with your investing and financial planning questions.  Full disclosure I am a fee-only advisor and a member of NAPFA the largest professional organization of fee-only advisors in the U.S.

Photo credit:  Flickr

Enhanced by Zemanta

Investment Diversification – A Look at the Basics

Share

Investment Diversification is one of the basic tools  of building a sound investment portfolio. Diversification is the fancy name for  the advice your mother might have given you:  Don’t put all of your eggs in one basket.  This is the basic tenant behind asset allocation, a key diversification tool.

My fellow finance blogger Ken Faulkenberry defines investment diversification as follows:

“Investment portfolio diversification is a portfolio strategy combining a variety of assets to reduce the overall risk of an investment portfolio. “  

A basic look at diversification 

Based on Ken’s definition you could use stocks, bonds, mutual funds, ETFs, private equity and a whole host of assets and asset types in building a diversified portfolio.  In the examples that will follow I am going to limit this to mutual funds investing in stocks and bonds.  Please note that nothing that follows should be construed as advice or a recommendation of any kind.  The mutual funds and allocation percentages used are for example only. 

Let’s start with an investor with $100,000 to invest.  Let’s go back in time to January 1, 2000.  One thought would be to pick a fund that invests in a variety of stocks.  Perhaps the Vanguard 500 Index Fund (VFINX) is a good choice.  How much would an investment of $100,000 have grown to by December 31, 2009, the end of the press has deemed the lost decade?  The answer is that your $100,000 investment would have shrunk to $90,165 for an average annual loss of 1.03%.  Truly a lost decade for this investor.

Let’s say this investor added the following funds to his portfolio:

  • Vanguard Small Cap Index (NAESX)
  • Vanguard Mid Cap Index (VIMSX)
  • Vanguard Total International Stock Index (VGTSX)

How much would an investment of $100,000 invested equally in each of these four funds have grown to by December 31, 2009?  (We are assuming no taxes or rebalancing in this and all examples in this article)  The answer is $137,511.  This is $47,346 or about 52% more than an investment of our investor’s cash only in the Vanguard 500 Index.  Let’s look at the average annual investment returns for each of these funds for the period 1/1/2000 – 12/31/2009:

Vanguard 500 Index -1.03%
Vanguard Small Cap Index  4.36%
Vanguard Mid Cap Index  6.13%
Vanguard Total International Stock Index 2.29%

 

While the average annualized return of 3.23% over the course of the decade is nothing to write home about, it does illustrate the potential benefits of diversification.

Let’s add some bonds 

Some say building a portfolio is much like cooking, which is one of my favorite pastimes.  My motto in the kitchen is “… when in doubt add more wine…”  Sadly wine and investing are not a good mix.

What if we added some bond funds to the mix?  In this case let’s add the following funds:

  • PIMco Total Return (PTTRX)
  • T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond (PRWBX)
  • American Century Inflation Adjusted Bond (ACITX)
  • Templeton Global Bond (TPINX)

If we now divide the investor’s $100,000 investment equally among the four equity funds from the prior example and among these four bond funds, by 12/31/2009 the $100,000 investment has grown to $174,506 or almost double what an investment of $100,000 in the Vanguard 500 Index Fund alone would have yielded.  The portfolio’s average annual return was 5.72% for the decade.

Looking at the average annual investment returns for each of the bond funds for the period 1/1/2000 – 12/31/2009:

PIMco Total Return 7.65%
T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond 4.89%
American Century Inflation Adjusted Bond  7.20%
Templeton Global Bond 10.66

 

The impact of diversification

Again this example was based on eight funds weighted equally with no rebalancing and the reinvestment of all distributions.  This was an unusual decade in that bonds largely held their own or outperformed equities.  It is likely that if we performed this same analysis for the ten years ended December 31, 2019 the results would look different.  None the less there are a few things we can take away from this analysis:

  • The decade 2000-2009 was a poor one for large cap stocks as illustrated by the use of the S&P 500 index fund.
  • Small, mid cap, and international equities outperformed domestic large cap stocks.
  • Diversifying the equity holdings in this example boosted overall portfolio return.
  • Bonds were aided by generally declining interest rates and lower volatility than equities.  Both of these factors helped their overall return for the decade and really boosted our hypothetical portfolio.  Bonds in general have a relatively low correlation to equities which assisted in mitigating the volatility of our portfolio and enhanced returns.
  • Even in this “lost decade” asset allocation helped enhance return.

What does this mean for the future? 

Clearly the period used in the analysis was unique one, a decade that contained market declines (as measured by the S&P 500 Index) of 49% from March of 2000 through October of 2002 and 57% from October of 2007 through early March of 2009.  However it seems that market volatility has become the norm rather than the exception so the current decade will likely be an interesting one as well.  A few lessons we can take forward:

  • Diversification reduces risk.
  • Diversification among assets with low correlations to one another further reduces risk.
  • Diversification is important because we have no way of knowing which investments or asset classes will perform well or poorly or when.

Please feel free to contact me with your investing and asset allocation questions. 

For you do-it-yourselfers, check out Morningstar.com to analyze your investment holdings and to get a free trial for their premium services.  Please check out our Resources page for links to some additional tools and services that might be beneficial to you. 

Note that all data used in this article was generated via Morningstar’s Advisor Workstation.

Photo Credit:  Flickr

 

Enhanced by Zemanta