Objective information about financial planning, investments, and retirement plans

4 Signs of a Lousy 401(k) Plan

Share

retirement

Much has been written about the sorry state of retirement readiness in the United States.  In fact the most frequently asked question that I get is Can I Retire? 

For better or worse, the primary responsibility for accumulating sufficient assets for retirement has been placed upon our shoulders in the form of defined contribution retirement plans such as the 401(k), 403(b), etc.  The defined benefit pension plans of our parent’s generation are rapidly fading away.

It is important that you make the most of any workplace retirement plan available to you.  New required disclosures about the costs of the plan and the underlying investments were introduced in 2012 and are a good start.  However, 401(k) plans are still a mystery to many of the workers who participate in them and sadly to many of the employers sponsoring these plans.  Here are 4 signs that your 401(k) plan might be lousy.

Proprietary Funds 

By this I mean your 401(k) plan provider or a brokerage firm affiliated with the plan offering their own mutual funds.  The most extreme recent example of this is Ameriprise Financial who is being sued by a group of current and former employees for allegedly stuffing the plan offered to company employees with poor performing, high cost funds offered by Ameriprise.  To boot they are also accused of taking revenue sharing payments from these funds.

While most examples are not this egregious, it should be a red flag if your plan is stuffed with funds or annuity sub-accounts from the likes of John Hancock or Principal and they also happen to be the provider of your retirement plan.  There are often many incentives to be had by servicing brokers and other service providers to offer this type of line-up.  While they are making money off of this type of plan, such an arrangement might be costing you big-time.

Single Fund Family Line-ups 

For years the broker/registered rep community would offer a line-up filled with funds from the American Funds.  These were often the best funds that they could sell and they rightly had a good name.

Just as bad is a line-up dominated by Vanguard or T. Rowe Price funds, or any other single fund family for that matter.  Even though I highly respect both companies, no single fund family offers the best option in every asset class.

Expensive share classes 

In many cases mutual fund companies offer a variety of share classes for use by various financial advisor channels ranging from fee-only RIAs to brokers and reps seeking compensation from selling the funds.  In many cases the fund families offer several retirement plan share classes as well, again with some offering compensation to the advisor directly or to the retirement plan.

Check out the funds offered in your plan via Morningstar or elsewhere to see if there are less expensive share classes of your fund that are available.  This even extends to low cost index fund providers like Vanguard who offer share classes which carry a lower expense ratio that the basic Investor share class.

A group annuity plan

This was the traditional fare for plans offered by insurance company providers.  They are still around but if your employer’s plan is still in this format it is likely small in size or it has been in a group annuity for awhile.

A group annuity plan generally offers either mutual funds or annuity sub-accounts that are “wrapped” into a group annuity.  These are complicated and generally expensive insurance contracts that often don’t bestow any particular benefit on the plan participants.  In fact some plans carry surrender charges that make it difficult for employers to change providers.

What do I do if my 401(k) plan is lousy? 

  • If there is a company match it often makes sense to contribute enough to receive the full match.  This is free money you shouldn’t leave it on the table.
  • Do your homework and say something to those in charge of administering the company’s plan.  This may or may not result in things changing, but many employers are more sensitive to this type of input in light of the current trends toward more disclosure and transparency.
  • If your plan offers a self-directed brokerage window check this option out.  Understand the costs and any limitations involved.  Also make sure that you are comfortable choosing your own investments or that you have an advisor to assist you.
  • Focus on retirement savings vehicles available outside of your plan including an IRA, maxing out a spouse’s retirement plan (if it’s better than yours), investing in a taxable account, or a low-cost annuity (ideally one with no surrender fees).
  • Make sure not to leave your money in this plan when you leave the company, roll it over to an IRA or to a new employer’s plan.

We are increasingly responsible for our own retirement savings.  It is important that you understand how to best utilize the retirement plan offered by your employer.  A good plan can be an invaluable tool in reaching your retirement savings goals.  A lousy, expensive plan can cost you $1,000s in lost retirement savings and might be the difference between retiring in style or settling for less in your Golden Years.

Please contact me at 847-506-9827 for a free 30 minute retirement planning consultation and to discuss all of your investing and financial planning questions. Check out our Financial Planning and Investment Advice for Individuals page to learn more about our services.   

Retirement plan sponsors, do you need an independent review of your company’s plan?  Do you need help selecting a new plan provider?  Are you looking for ongoing financial advice to help you meet your fiduciary obligations and to provide a superior retirement savings vehicle for your employees?  Please feel free to contact me to learn about our investment consulting services for retirement plan sponsors.

The Chicago Financial Planner is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. If you click on my Amazon.com links and buy anything, even something other than the product advertised, I earn a small fee, yet you don’t pay any extra. Click on the Amazon banner below to go directly to the main site or browse the selections in our Book Store.

Photo Credit:  Flickr

Enhanced by Zemanta

If you enjoyed this article, please enter your email address to receive the latest updates about financial planning, investments, and retirement plans.

Comments

  1. Good post Roger! It always amazes me (though I guess it should not) when I see 401k plans that are just no good. It’s important to offer that flexibility and choice of some solid low fee funds. One thing I would add is the rebalance feature. My wife’s former employer worked out a deal where they only offered quarterly rebalancing. They charged a fee to boot, we asked them if they would consider negotiating it to a semi-annual/annual option and they were unwilling to. So, we had to do it manually every six months.

    • Roger Wohlner says:

      John thanks for your comment. I honestly have never heard of an instance where employees where charged for auto-rebalancing of their retirement plan. I’d be curious as to who the plan provider was, just shaking my head. As to the number of lousy plans out there it is astounding.

  2. I think you make a good point about investing in the 401(k) to at least get the company match. There are many other alternatives after you’ve received the match. Most 401(k) plans are so lousy and the small business owners are clueless about it. Roger, what are your thoughts on how to correct this problem?

    • Roger Wohlner says:

      Oliver thanks for your comment. In many cases small business owners (and the owners of some larger companies) are too busy running their businesses and often don’t know the questions to ask or the differences in plan providers, platforms, advisors, etc. Most business owners that I’ve dealt with want to do the right thing for their empoloyees they just aren’t sure how to go about it. Too often the rep who handles their insurance, or worse yet their payroll provider will say “… hey we can solve your 401(k) issues…” and the employees are more often than not stuck in a high fee plan with average or worse investment choices.

  3. Very good article. I believe part of the disconnect is that the H.R. people are not properly trained on yhe benefits and drawbacks that are inherant in there plan. They have no idea about Erisa and these hard working people are expected to explain why these recently hired people should be utilizing this plan.

  4. Tim Brown says:

    Very good article Roger. I have this same type of discussion with current clients and prospects alike. I am amazed sometimes when I take a look at the existing plan for a prospect and I see the group annuity products out there. In just about every case, even with fee disclosure, the trustees and plan sponsors have no idea how much they are paying for their services. Although, having said that, when fee disclosure first starting getting discussed, I did see a drop in the fees that many of those organizations charge. It still is somewhat on the high side, but much lower than it was 10 years ago. I think the bigger problem is that the sponsors have no idea what the fees are.

    The plans that are difficult are the small plans ($500k and under in assets) and small company startups. They are almost always more expensive on a percentage basis because it’s difficult to get providers, especially advisors who work on a % of assets basis, to provide services. No one wants to work for free and shouldn’t have to. So the plan ends up with either a very high RIA fee, or they are in C shares and American Funds R1′s.

    I do think that the industry as a whole is getting a bad rap though in the press and from our friends in Washington. There are alot of bad plans out there, but the good ones are typically lumped together with the bad.

    Good article. Thanks.

    • Roger Wohlner says:

      Tim thanks for your comment. I totally agree with your comment on smaller plan it is difficult to find a good, low cost platform with a robust fund menu. I also agree that the many good, well-run plans out there are getting a bad rap which is too bad in that I have worked with many clients who have or are in the process of accumulating significant retirement nest-eggs via their 401(k) plans. I am also proud of the positive impact that I’ve had on the plans that I advise and I know that many advisor colleagues can say the same.

  5. James Masters says:

    While there are some good points to your article, it really sweeps with a very broad brush. There are cases where a platform like American Funds Recordkeeper Direct is an excellent option for a small employer. Yes, it is a proprietary fund line-up, but in truth they are a good investment manager in many areas, and offer funds at relatively low expenses. Additionally, the recordkeeping cost of this platform is fairly nominal for the small employer.

    I acknowledge that some of the providers you mention here can be quite costly to the employer on both small plans and larger ones, but we shouldn’t assume that all products from an insurance company are bad and unreasonably expensive. Great West is quite competitive with their Premier Key platform and offers open architecture (yes, with their Maxim target date or asset allocation funds).

    Not all small employers can write the check out of cash flow for plan services and in exchange get the stripped down pricing on fund expenses and recordkeeping. Some have to do it another way in order to offer the plan to their employees and be able to contribute the match on their behalf.

    Many points you make are valid, but we can’t paint with such a broad brush and assume that most plans are lousy and expensive and employers and participants are being cheated.

    • Roger Wohlner says:

      James thank you for your comment. The article was meant mostly to provide readers (plan participants, plan sponsors, and others) with some potential red flags to prompt them to question the status quo. As with anything in the realm of retirement plans and investing asking questions is a good first step, however each individual situation is unique and requires a unique review.

  6. Tom Holstein says:

    James, I agree with your points. My company is a “Third Party Administrator” for business retirement plans. All we do is administration, consulting and compliance with an objective of keeping our clients, the IRS and DOL happy.

    For lack of a better term, we “broker” around 20 different vendor relationships – Proprietary, Group Annuity, and Open Architecture. When presented with a business opportunity we look at the pricing and cost/benefits of each vendor and the needs and objectives of the financial advisor who is bringing us the business.

    The generalizations hold as much water as “all products made in xxxx are poorly made” or “all (members of a political party) are idiots”. Each vendor provides an important service to a particular segment of the retirement market. If they do a poor job, or are too costly, they’ll naturally fade away or be bought.

    • Roger Wohlner says:

      Tom thanks for your comment. I’m assuming that you are not a “producing TPA” and I’m sure that your clients value your firm’s independence. As I mentioned in my comment to James the purpose of this post was to encourage participants and sponsors to raise questions. Nobody is saying that all vendors in the insurance sector or the brokerage sector are bad, but in my experience there are enough that are that participants and sponsors should ask questions. The 401(k) is for better or worse the primary retirement saving vehicle for a large percentage of the working population in this country. Having a plan with high cost, poor performing funds makes the hill to get to retirement just that much steeper.

  7. rikk says:

    good article. i think one of the most important keys here is to monitor your return. no one cares more about your money than you. every 1% increase you can get on your return makes an exponential difference on the amount of money you will have.

  8. This is vital information. Sadly the day of the defined benefit plan is over so most of us no longer have retired benefit defined by salary and year of service. This is the biggest hoax laid on Americans. Defined contribution plans like 401(k), profit sharing and money purchase plans will not have enough in them for retirement in most cases. People have to know this and know that even putting the maximum into these plans is not enough.
    Your point about bad investments inside these plan are even more problematic in that in most cases nothing can really be done except complaining bitterly to HR.
    Load funds and those with high expense ratios are killers so that is just rubbing salt into the wound.

    • Roger Wohlner says:

      Steven thanks for your comment. There are certainly a lot of lousy 401(k) plans out there which makes the task of saving for one’s own retirement even more difficult than it is. I do have to disagree, however that diligent and high levels of salary deferrals are not a key element in the formula to achieve a financially successful retirement. I have a number of clients for whom their 401(k) will provide a significant portion of what is/will be a comfortable retirement. I do agree that a defined contribution plan alone will likely not be enough to fund a comfortable retirement for most people. My beef is with the bad, high cost, low quality plans foisted on too many plan sponsors by commissioned reps and the fact that many plan sponsors don’t know what questions to ask of these reps. The good news is that the recent mandated disclosures seem to have made more plan sponsors question their providers and the plans that they are in. Additionally participant advice seems to have gained some traction in the market place.

  9. harry @ 4HWD says:

    I’ve only worked for two mega corps and they both had awesome 401k plans with good choices and low fees. I don’t know what I’d do if I had to switch to a bad 401k..deal-breaker I guess? haha

  10. Debra says:

    I wonder how many employees thought def ben plans were a God given right and carped and complained about how lousy there were. Problem solved! There’s a reason they’re called BENEFITS rather than rights or entitlements or even requirements. People are free to look the company right in the eye and say “who needs your stinking 3% contribution? I’m just grateful that in spite of lawsuits and criticism that they’re not giving even more, that companies are still willing to provide this benefit when so many other companies no longer do.

    • Roger Wohlner says:

      Debra thank you for your comment. I do agree that sometimes employees seem ungrateful for the benefit of having a 401(k) plan. However it generally doesn’t cost an employer any more to offer a low cost, high quality plan for their employees and in some cases might even be cheaper for them. The match of course is an out of pocket expense that an employer has weigh on a cost-benefit basis. In some cases where employees are in industries where the best workers are scarce or highly in demand the costs of offering a better match and a better plan may be far offset by benefit the benefit derives by having a plan that is an incentive to attract and retain these top employees.

  11. Very good article. However, I think “lousy” is a bit overstated if the plan only presented offerings from one, single fund family.

    Granted, you did qualify the statement by saying that each of the fund families mentioned had fine offerings…

    But if I was in a plan which only offered index funds from each of the major asset classes, and if all of those funds were from a single fund family, I would not consider that plan to be lousy.

    • Roger Wohlner says:

      David thanks for your comment. I would agree with you in certain cases assuming that the index funds offered are truly low cost funds. Just because it is an index fund doesn’t mean its cheap, the variation among families can be significant. That said in my experience most single family plans don’t offer only low cost index funds and in my opinion no single family has all top-notch funds in each asset class. Its really not that expensive for a plan sponsor to offer a plan with a mix of solid low cost index and active funds that provides a great retirement saving vehicle for their participants.

Speak Your Mind

*